4.5 Article

Molecular cloning, mRNA expression, and characterization of HSP90 gene from Chinese mitten crab Eriocheir japonica sinensis

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpb.2008.12.017

关键词

HSP90; cDNA cloning; mRNA expression; Characterization; Eriocheir japonica sinensis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30630010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

HSP90 is a highly conserved molecular chaperone important in the maturation of a broad spectrum of proteins. Using expressed sequence tag (EST) and rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) techniques, an HSP90 gene designated as EjsHSP90 was cloned and characterized from the Chinese mitten crab Eriocheir japonica sinensis. The full-length cDNA of EjsHSP90 is 2,517 bp and contains an open reading frame of 2157 bp which encodes a 718 amino acid polypeptide (82.8 kDa) bearing characteristics of the HSP90 family and an ATP binding domain. Sequence alignment shows that EjsHSP90 shared 79%-96% identity with HSP90 sequences reported in other animals, and it shares identical structural features fluorescent real-time quantitative RT-PCR approach was performed to examine the expression profiles of EjsHSP90 mRNA by testing its relative level in three types of tissues at three different developmental stages, respectively. We found that EjsHSP90 is expressed throughout the three developmental stages but expression levels varied among different body parts of crabs. EjsHSP90 mRNA expression in the abdomen of the first crab stage is consistently higher than that of the other two stages, suggesting that EjsHSP90 gene is involved in the crabs' early developmental process, especially in the crab brachyurization process. Results from quantitative RT-PCR excluded the possibility that the expression of EjsHSP90 mRNA is induced primarily by osmotic stress. Phylogenetic analyses reveal that HSP90 gene is informative and complementary for reconstruction of arthropod phylogenetic relationships. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据