4.6 Article

Adiabatic Limit and the Slow Motion of Vortices in a Chern-Simons-Schrodinger System

期刊

COMMUNICATIONS IN MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS
卷 290, 期 2, 页码 597-632

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00220-009-0844-y

关键词

-

资金

  1. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/G000581/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. STFC [ST/G000581/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We study a nonlinear system of partial differential equations in which a complex field (the Higgs field) evolves according to a nonlinear Schrodinger equation, coupled to an electromagnetic field whose time evolution is determined by a Chern-Simons term in the action. In two space dimensions, the Chern-Simons dynamics is a Galileo invariant evolution for A, which is an interesting alternative to the Lorentz invariant Maxwell evolution, and is finding increasing numbers of applications in two dimensional condensed matter field theory. The system we study, introduced by Manton, is a special case (for constant external magnetic field, and a point interaction) of the effective field theory of Zhang, Hansson and Kivelson arising in studies of the fractional quantum Hall effect. From the mathematical perspective the system is a natural gauge invariant generalization of the nonlinear Schrodinger equation, which is also Galileo invariant and admits a self-dual structure with a resulting large space of topological solitons (the moduli space of self-dual Ginzburg-Landau vortices). We prove a theorem describing the adiabatic approximation of this system by a Hamiltonian system on the moduli space. The approximation holds for values of the Higgs self-coupling constant lambda close to the self-dual (Bogomolny) value of 1. The viability of the approximation scheme depends upon the fact that self-dual vortices form a symplectic submanifold of the phase space (modulo gauge invariance). The theorem provides a rigorous description of slow vortex dynamics in the near self-dual limit.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据