4.7 Article

High-pressure 1D fuel/air-ratio measurements with LIBS

期刊

COMBUSTION AND FLAME
卷 198, 期 -, 页码 120-129

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2018.09.009

关键词

Turbulent flame; Fuel-air ratio; One-dimensional; Nanosecond; Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy; High pressure

资金

  1. Air Force SBIR [FA8650-15-M-2593]
  2. Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) [FA8650-16-C-2725, FA8650-15-D-2518]
  3. Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR) LRIR [14RQ06COR]
  4. NSF [1,418,848]
  5. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1418848] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Quantitative, one-dimensional (1D), single-laser-shot, fuel-air ratio (FAR) measurements in both laminar and turbulent methane-air flames were conducted using time-gated nanosecond-laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (ns-LIBS) line imaging. In the laminar methane-air flames at a pressure of 1-11 bar, hydrogen (H-alpha) and nitrogen (N-II) atomic emission lines at 568 and 656 nm, respectively, were selected to establish a correlation between the line intensities and the local FAR. The spatial calibration profiles of the N/H ratios in the flames at various pressures were obtained in one dimension. The effects of the laser energy and pressure on the stability and precision of the 1D FAR measurements were investigated. It was observed that the N/H correlation is significantly reduced at similar to 11 bar, which sets the limits of the 1D LIBS-based FAR measurements. Single-laser-shot 1D FAR measurements were conducted in a turbulent flame at atmospheric pressure, and multiline LIBS was performed to extend the measurement area of interest. Spatially and spectrally resolved line LIBS can provide the local FAR with a spatial resolution of similar to 0.1 mm. These results hold promise for the utilization of ns-LIBS for spatially resolved 1D FAR measurements in turbulent flames at elevated pressures. (C) 2018 The Combustion Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据