4.7 Article

Improvement of quercetin protective effect against oxidative stress skin damages by incorporation in nanovesicles

期刊

COLLOIDS AND SURFACES B-BIOINTERFACES
卷 123, 期 -, 页码 566-574

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2014.09.059

关键词

Natural antioxidant; Phospholipid vesicles; Glycerol; Confocal microscopy; Hydrogen peroxide damage; Human keratinocytes

资金

  1. MIUR, Italy [2010H834LS_004]
  2. Fondazione Banco di Sardegna

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Quercetin was incorporated in glycerosomes, new phospholipid-glycerol vesicles, and their protective effect against oxidative stress skin damages was extensively evaluated. In particular, the concentration-dependent effect of glycerol (from 10 to 50%) on vesicle suitability as cutaneous carriers of quercetin was carefully assessed. All vesicles were unilamellar and small in size (similar to 80-110nm), as confirmed by cryo-TEM observation, with a drug incorporation efficiency ranging between 81 and 91%. SAXS studies, performed to investigate the bilayer arrangement, indicated a strong, dose-dependent interaction of glycerol with the polar portions of the phospholipid molecules, while quercetin did not significantly change the bilayer packing. In vitro studies on newborn pigskin underlined the concentration-dependent ability of glycerosomes to promote quercetin accumulation in the different layers, also confirmed by confocal microscopic observation of skin treated with fluorescent vesicles. Quercetin incorporated into liposomal and glycerosomal nanoformulations showed a strong ability to scavenge free radicals (DPPH test) and protect human keratinocytes in vitro against hydrogen peroxide damage. Moreover, quercetin-loaded vesicles were avidly taken up by keratinocytes in vitro. Overall, results indicate 40 and 50% glycerosomes as promising nanosystems for the improvement of cutaneous quercetin delivery and keratinocyte protection against oxidative stress damage. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据