4.4 Article

Optimization of parameters in preparation of PCM microcapsules based on melamine formaldehyde through dispersion polymerization

期刊

COLLOID AND POLYMER SCIENCE
卷 292, 期 2, 页码 355-368

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00396-013-3076-9

关键词

Microencapsulation; Dispersion polymerization; Morphology; Phase change material; Melamine formaldehyde

资金

  1. Iran Polymer and Petrochemical Institute (IPPI) [24713105]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microencapsulated phase change materials have attracted special attention due to their wide applications in saving and releasing energy. Here, microencapsulation of hexadecane (HD) in melamine formaldehyde shell was carried out through in situ dispersion polymerization in the aqueous media. Some important parameters such as stabilizer type and amount, surfactant amount, homogenization conditions as the critical affective factors on final particle size, morphology, and thermal resistance of the microcapsules were investigated extensively. The obtained microcapsules were concurrently analyzed by SEM, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) techniques. SEM images showed that the best stabilization was achieved by polyvinyl alcohol. Also, particle size, as an indication of surface area for heat transfer properties, showed a decrement by increasing stabilizer amount, surfactant amount, and homogenization speed. The amount of entrapped HD and efficiencies of microencapsulation were determined by DSC, and the reason for observing such changes were discussed in detail. Thermal stability of the microcapsules as an important property for their performance was investigated, too. The results illustrated that an improved thermal stability would be obtained by an efficient stabilization in the emulsification step. Also the highest thermal stability up to 388 A degrees C was reached at homogenization speed of 6,000 rpm. Finally, the optimized conditions for desirable encapsulation were proposed in such systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据