4.1 Article

Fish Traders on the Kenyan Coast: Livelihoods, Bargaining Power, and Participation in Management

期刊

COASTAL MANAGEMENT
卷 42, 期 6, 页码 531-554

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/08920753.2014.964819

关键词

fisheries; gender; governance; vulnerability; coastal livelihoods

资金

  1. Ecosystem Services for Poverty Alleviation (ESPA) programme through the project Participatory Modelling of Wellbeing Tradeoffs in Coastal Kenya (P-Mowtick) [REF:NE/I00324X/1]
  2. Department for International Development (DFID)
  3. Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC)
  4. Natural Environment Research Council (NERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although gender plays a key role in mediating social relations and livelihood dynamics in fisheries, women's roles have received little attention in many fisheries. Mama karanga are women on the Kenyan coast who buy and process fish for local markets from small-scale fishermen. Mama karanga provide a link between the fishery and poor fish consumers, but are also vulnerable to changes in the fishery due to a lack of education, alternative livelihoods, and capital. Despite their dependence on the fishery and potential importance for food security, mama karanga have been little studied, and this article presents a description of their livelihood and a contribution to the growing literature on gender, fisheries and natural resource management. The livelihoods framework is used to organize information on mama karanga's bargaining power and participation in fisheries management. Bargaining power and access to fish is determined mostly by financial capital, the level of fish catches, and social capital, including complex relations with each other, and fishermen. While mama karanga are aware of fisheries management issues, their active participation is limited due to lack of assets and highly imbalanced gender power relations. In order to integrate important actors such as mama karanga, fisheries governance needs to expand in scope and address gender-based barriers to participation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据