4.2 Article

An fMRI Study Examining Effects of Acute D-Cycloserine During Symptom Provocation in Spider Phobia

期刊

CNS SPECTRUMS
卷 14, 期 10, 页码 556-571

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1092852900024044

关键词

-

资金

  1. University of Kansas Medical Center Clinical Pilot Research Grant
  2. Hoglund Brain Imaging Center Pilot Research Fund
  3. American Psychological Association Dissertation Scholarship
  4. American Psychological Foundation Research Scholarship
  5. Forrest and Sally Hoglund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Exposure-based therapy for anxiety disorders is believed to operate on the basis of fear extinction. Studies have shown acute administration of D-cycloserine (DCS) enhances fear extinction in animals and facilitates exposure therapy in humans, but the neural mechanisms are not completely understood. To date, no study has examined neural effects of acute DCS in anxiety-disordered populations. Methods: Two hours prior to functional magnetic resonance imaging scanning, 23 spider-phobic and 23 non-phobic participants were randomized to receive DCS 100 mg or placebo, During scanning, participants viewed spider, butterfly, and Gaussian-blurred baseline images in a block-design paradigm. Diagnostic and treatment groups were compared regarding differential activations to spider versus butterfly stimuli. Results: In the phobic group, DCS enhanced prefrontal (PFC), dorsal anterior cingulate (ACC), and insula activations. For controls, DCS enhanced ventral ACC and caudate activations. There was a positive correlation between lateral PFC and amygdala activation for the placebo-phobic group. Reported distress during symptom provocation was correlated with amygdala activation in the placebo-phobic group and orbitofrontal cortex activation in the DCS-phobic group. Conclusions: Results suggest that during initial phobic symptom provocation DCS enhances activation in regions involved in cognitive control and interoceptive integration, including the PFC, ACC, and insular cortices for phobic participants, CNS Spectr. 2009;14(10):556-571

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据