4.7 Article

Change in Plasma Levels of Amino Acid Neurotransmitters and its Correlation with Clinical Heterogeneity in Early Parkinson's Disease Patients

期刊

CNS NEUROSCIENCE & THERAPEUTICS
卷 19, 期 11, 页码 889-896

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cns.12165

关键词

Amino acid neurotransmitter; Clinical heterogeneity; Motor subtype; Parkinson's disease

资金

  1. Jiangsu Province's Special Fund for Scientific & Technical Innovation and Achievement Transformation (Life & Health Science and Technology) [BL2012025]
  2. National Natural Science Funds of China [81000119]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundThe correlation between plasma amino acid (AA) neurotransmitters and clinical heterogeneity in early patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) is still poorly understood. AimsTo examine the plasma levels of AA neurotransmitters in early patients with PD and to evaluate their correlation with PD subtypes. MethodsBased on the predominant symptoms, fifty-one patients with PD were enrolled and divided into four subgroups: (1) akinetic-rigid type (ART), (2) tremor-dominant type (TDT), (3) postural instability/gait difficulty type (PIGD), and (4) mixed type (MT). Plasma levels of AA were measured by HPLC-RF, and their potential diagnostic practicality and their association with PD subtypes were evaluated by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and correlation analysis, respectively. ResultsPatients with PD exhibited markedly lower levels of Asp, Glu, Tau, L-ser, and lower values of Glu/GABA ratio than healthy controls. The ROC analysis revealed their high sensitivity (77.1-87.5%) and specificity (58.8-88.2%). Furthermore, the glutamic acid (Glu), -aminobutyric acid (GABA) level in the PIGD subtype was increased as compared with other subtypes and was negatively correlated with the ART/PIGD ratio. ConclusionThe decrease in plasma Asp, Glu, Tau, L-ser levels, and the value of Glu/GABA ratio may be helpful for early PD diagnosis. The elevated GABA level may be the biochemical basis for the specific symptoms of PIGD PD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据