4.7 Article

Aquaporin-4 Deficiency Attenuates Opioid Dependence through Suppressing Glutamate Transporter-1 Down-regulation and Maintaining Glutamate Homeostasis

期刊

CNS NEUROSCIENCE & THERAPEUTICS
卷 19, 期 1, 页码 12-19

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/cns.12012

关键词

Aquaporin-4; Astrocyte; Glutamate homeostasis; Glutamate transporter-1; Opioid dependence

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2009CB522008]
  2. Beijing Nature Science Foundations [7113162, 7102124]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Glutamate homeostasis plays a critical role in mediating the addiction-related behaviors. Therefore, preventing the disruption or reestablishing of it is a novel strategy for the treatment of addiction. Glutamate transporters are responsible for clearing extracellular glutamate and maintaining glutamate homeostasis. Our previous work demonstrated that aquaporin-4 (AQP4) deficiency attenuated morphine dependence, but the mechanisms are unclear. According to the recent evidence that AQP4 might form a functional complex with glutamate transporter-1 (GLT-1), this study focused on whether AQP4 participates in the modulation of GLT-1 and glutamate homeostasis in morphine-dependent mice. Results We found that AQP4 knockout prevented the down-regulations of GLT-1 expression and glutamate clearance when mice were repeatedly treated with morphine. Further study revealed that inhibition of GLT-1 by dihydrokainic acid (DHK) initiated morphine dependence in AQP4 knockout mice. In addition, AQP4 knockout abolished both decreases and increases in the extracellular glutamate levels in the prefrontal cortex during repeated morphine treatment and naloxone-precipitated withdrawal. Conclusion AQP4 deficiency suppresses the down-regulation of GLT-1, and the disruption of glutamate homeostasis caused by repeated exposure to morphine, pointing to a strategy for maintaining glutamate homeostasis and thereby treating addiction through the modulation of AQP4 function and expression.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据