4.2 Article

The association of HLA-G and immune markers in recurrent miscarriages

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE
卷 29, 期 18, 页码 3056-3060

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2015.1114085

关键词

CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes; HLA-G; natural killer cells; recurrent miscarriages

资金

  1. Scientific Research Projects Commission of Celal Bayar University [2013/125]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To determine role of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-G, CD8, CD16, CD56, interferon (IFN)-gamma, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha for recurrent miscarriages in feto-maternal interface. Method: Chorion and decidua samples were obtained from 11 women with unwanted pregnancies (healthy pregnancy, HP) and 10 women with missed abortion diagnosis after at least two pregnancy losses (recurrent miscarriage, RM). In addition, endometrial tissues were obtained from 10 non-pregnant women (NonP). The expressions of markers were evaluated using the Western blot analysis. The values obtained between different groups were compared. Results: The highest protein expression of CD56 was found in the HP compared to NonP and RM. Meanwhile, the lowest protein expression of CD16 was observed in the NonP compared to HP and RM. The HLA-G expression exhibited the highest level in HP; however, there was no statistically significant difference between groups. CD8 and IFN gamma expressions were lowest in the NonP group; however, TNF-alpha was highest in the RM group. Conclusions: The CD56 expression of uterine NK cells may be an indicator of a HP. However, not statistically significant, the increased expression of CD16, CD8, and also significantly increased expression of TNF may be associated with the predominant cytotoxic activity in the maternal immune system in patients with RM. Although there was no change in the expression of HLA-G, this finding may mean that the maternal immune system is unresponsive to HLA-G-mediated immunosuppressive signals originating from the fetus in these cases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据