4.7 Article

Elevated plasma arginase-1 does not affect plasma arginine in patients undergoing liver resection

期刊

CLINICAL SCIENCE
卷 114, 期 3-4, 页码 231-241

出版社

PORTLAND PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1042/CS20070143

关键词

amino acid; arginase-1; arginine; cell injury; liver resection; hepatocyte; transplantation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Arginine is an important substrate in health and disease. It is a commonly held view that arginase-1 release from injured erythrocytes and hepatocytes leads to arginine breakdown; however, the true relationship between plasma arginase-1 concentration and activity has remained unaddressed. In the present study, blood was sampled from patients undergoing liver resection, a known cause of hepatocyte injury and arginase-1 release, to determine arginase-1, arginine and ornithine plasma levels. Arginase activity was assessed in vitro by measuring changes in arginine and ornithine plasma levels during incubation of plasma and whole-blood samples at 37 degrees C. Arginase-1 plasma levels increased 8-10-fold during liver resection, whereas arginine and ornithine levels remained unchanged. In accordance with these in vivo findings, arginine and ornithine levels remained unchanged in plasma incubated at 37 degrees C irrespective of the arginase-1 concentration. In contrast, arginine plasma levels in whole blood decreased significantly during incubation, with ornithine increasing stoichiometrically. These changes were irrespective of arginase-1 plasma levels and were explained by arginase activity present in intact erythrocytes. Next, plasma samples with 1000-fold normal arginase-1 concentrations were obtained from patients undergoing cadaveric liver transplantation. A significant decrease in arginine plasma levels occurred in vivo and in vitro. In contrast with commonly held views, moderately increased arginase-1 plasma levels do not affect plasma arginine. Very high plasma arginase-1 levels are required to induce potential clinically relevant effects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据