4.4 Article

Analysis of initial and follow-up CT findings in patients with invasive pulmonary aspergillosis after solid organ transplantation

期刊

CLINICAL RADIOLOGY
卷 67, 期 12, 页码 1179-1186

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2012.02.018

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

AIM: To assess initial and follow-up CT findings of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients using new diagnostic criteria, and to compare initial CT findings of survivors with those of patients who died. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-six adult SOT patients who met the 2008 EORTC/MSG criteria for proven or probable invasive pulmonary aspergillosis were assessed. Initial CT findings of the 21 survivors and 15 patients who died of IPA-related causes were compared using the internationally recognized thoracic glossary of terms. The extents of the largest lesions in each of 18 surviving were measured and changes of those lesions were recorded. RESULTS: Consolidation or mass was the most common finding, observed in 33 of 46 patients (72%), followed by large nodules (59%), ground-glass opacity (50%), and infarcted consolidation (48%). Consolidation or mass was significantly less frequent in survivors than in patients who died (62% versus 93%). Cavitation was more common (43% versus 13%), and significantly smaller (7.5 cm(2) versus 19 cm(2), p = 0.014) in survivors. Follow-up CT in survivors showed that the halo sign resolved rapidly within 4 weeks. The extent of consolidation, infarcted consolidation, and internal low-density area decreased gradually with time to reduce to half the size in 3 weeks. Large nodules persisted for the first 7 days (84%), followed by slow regression. CONCLUSION: Consolidation or mass is the most common CT finding of IPA in SOT recipients. Absence of consolidation or mass and presence of small cavities may be associated with better prognosis. The time for resolution of each pattern after treatment varies. (C) 2012 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据