4.7 Article

Deformation Behavior of the Zr53.5Cu26.5Ni5Al12Ag3 Bulk Metallic Glass Over a Wide Range of Strain Rate and Temperatures

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 31, 期 9, 页码 941-945

出版社

JOURNAL MATER SCI TECHNOL
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmst.2015.06.001

关键词

Bulk metallic glasses; Viscosity; Deformation behavior; Compression; Constitutive equation

资金

  1. One Hundred Person Project of the Chinese Academy of Sciences
  2. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences: SJ10-Recoverable Scientific Experiment Satellite [XDA04020411, XDA04020202-11]
  3. National Basic Research Program of China [2011CB606301]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The stress-strain relations for the Zr53.5Cu26.5Ni5Al12Ag3 bulk metallic glass (BMG) over a broad range of temperatures (room temperature to its supercooled liquid region) and strain rates (10(-4) to 10(-1) s(-1)) were established in uniaxial compression using a thermal-mechanical simulation system. The superplastic flow was seen above its glass transition temperature (T-g = 694 K) and strain rates of up to 10(-1) s(-1) from the variation of stress-strain curves. A deformation map of strain rate vs temperature of Zr53.5Cu26.5Ni5Al12Ag3 was obtained, which was mainly composed of homogeneous and inhomogeneous deformation regions, the former featuring either Newtonian or non-Newtonian flow while the latter characterizing linear elastic behavior followed by shear localization, respectively. A phenomenological constitutive equation used to describe a master curve of viscosity with respect to the strain rate was obtained by fitting the experimental results, which determines the viscosity of the present alloy at the temperature near and above Tg. The results show the Zr53.5Cu26.5Ni5Al12Ag3 BMG is the subject suitable for net shape forming process at the supercooled liquid region. Copyright (C) 2015, The editorial office of Journal of Materials Science & Technology. Published by Elsevier Limited. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据