4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Surgical Technique: A Cup-in-Cup Technique to Restore Offset in Severe Protrusio Acetabular Defects

期刊

CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH
卷 470, 期 2, 页码 435-441

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11999-011-2075-8

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Severe medial and/or superior defects encountered in revision THA are currently managed with jumbo (a parts per thousand yen 66 mm) acetabular components and modular augments, with reconstruction cages, or with the cup-cage technique. Preoperative planning can indicate when these techniques may not restore vertical and horizontal offset. Failure to restore offset can lead to impingement, leg length inequality, abductor weakness, and dislocation. We developed a cup-in-cup technique in which a porous tantalum acetabular shell was impacted into supportive medial host bone. A second tantalum shell was then cemented in, and this shell's diameter could be selected based on preoperative planning to achieve restoration of horizontal and vertical offset. We implanted porous tantalum hemispheric shells in seven patients undergoing eight revision THAs. The average age was 73 years at the time of the procedure. Preoperative defects per the classification of Paprosky et al. were three IIC, four IIIA, and one IIIB. All patients were followed clinically and radiographically for a minimum of 12 months (average, 28 months; range, 12-50 months). Abductor strength was either improved by one grade (four hips) or unchanged (four hips). Horizontal offset was increased an average of 10.5 mm (range, 8-16 mm), and vertical offset improved by an average of 18.4 mm (range, 10-29 mm). There was no evidence of loosening or migration at the time of final followup. At short-term followup, the early experience cautiously supports the use of this construct. Long-term followup and a larger patient experience will be required to determine the durability of this novel technique. Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据