4.6 Article

Reduced Articular Surface of One-piece Cups A Cause of Runaway Wear and Early Failure

期刊

CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH
卷 468, 期 9, 页码 2328-2332

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11999-010-1383-8

关键词

-

资金

  1. Winkler Fund
  2. Smith Arthritis Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Despite the clinical success of modern metal-on-metal articulations, concerns with wear-related release of metal ions persist. Evidence suggests metal ion release is related to the effective coverage of the head in the metal shell (the cup's functional articular arc). A recent study suggests a reduced functional articular arc is associated with increased ion release and the arc is a function of component design, size, and the abduction angle. Questions/purposes The purposes of this study were to (1) measure the functional articular arc in different sizes of currently available one-piece metal shells from several different manufacturers; and (2) compare the functional articular arc of these one-piece metal shells with the 1808 arc of conventional hip arthroplasty acetabular components. Methods We calculated the available articular surface arc for 33 one-piece metal cups using measurements of cup depth and internal cup radius. Results The arc of the articular surface varied among manufacturers and generally decreased with decreasing shell diameter. The mean functional articular arc was 160.5 degrees +/- 3.6 degrees (range, 151.8 degrees - 165.8 degrees), which was less than the 180 degrees arc of a conventional acetabular component. Conclusions Our data show certain cup designs are at higher risk for failure as a result of the decreased articular surface arc. This, along with analysis of abduction angles, supports the recent findings of bearing failure with vertically placed implants. Care must be taken when implanting these shells to ensure they are placed in less abduction to avoid edge loading and the potential for early bearing failure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据