4.7 Review

The association between fat mass and the risk of breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

期刊

CLINICAL NUTRITION
卷 38, 期 4, 页码 1496-1503

出版社

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2018.09.013

关键词

Fat mass; Breast cancer; Obesity; Meta-analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background & aims: Several cohort and case control studies examined the association between fat mass (FM) and the risk of breast cancer; however, findings are conflicting. The purpose of the present study was to systematically review this association and conducted a meta-analysis, if possible. Method: A systematic search of PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Web of Science and Embase databases was conducted for cohort and case control studies, between January 2000 and 31 March 2018 with no language limitations. Multivariate adjusted relative risk (RR) estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for each category of FM were pooled to examine the association. Results: Finally, 12 papers were considered for quantitative synthesis. The pooled RR for the highest vs. the lowest FM (%) of cohort studies was 1.44 (95% CI: 1.33, 1.56; I-2: 63.3%, p = 0.008). The overall effect size for adjusted case control studies showed no significant association (1.49, 95% CI: 0.77, 2.90; I-2: 93.2%; p = 0.001). After stratification by menopause, it was revealed that the association between FM and the risk of breast cancer in post menopausal women (2.29, 95% CI: 1.12, 4.68; I-2: 92%, p = 0.0001) was significant, while there was no significant association in pre-menopausal women (0.68, 95% CI: 0.18, 2.58; I-2: 81.3%; p = 0.02). Conclusion: Cohort studies showed that higher FM is positively associated with the risk for breast cancer. However, only case control studies on post-menopausal women showed a positive link. Due to limited studies and high heterogeneity, findings should be interpreted with caution. More cohort studies are needed to clarify this association. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据