4.7 Article

Reduced absorption of long-chain fatty acids during methotrexate-induced gastrointestinal mucositis in the rat

期刊

CLINICAL NUTRITION
卷 32, 期 3, 页码 452-459

出版社

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2012.10.002

关键词

Gastrointestinal mucositis; Long-chain fatty acids; Nutrient absorption; Liver fatty acid appearance; Chemotherapy; Citrulline

资金

  1. Fonds NutsOhra (The Netherlands)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background & aims: Patients with chemotherapy-induced gastrointestinal mucositis suffer from weight loss and possibly malabsorption. Since long-chain fatty acids serve important functions in the body, we aimed to determine the intestinal capacity of fat absorption in rats with and without methotrexate-induced mucositis. Methods: Four days after intravenous injection with methotrexate (60 mg/kg) or saline, rats received saturated ([U-C-13]palmitic acid) and unsaturated ([U-C-13]linoleic acid) fatty acids dissolved in oil, either as a single bolus by oral gavage or by continuous intraduodenal infusion. We determined plasma and liver label concentrations at specific time points. Results: We confirmed methotrexate-induced mucositis by villus atrophy using microscopy. Methotrexate treatment severely reduced the appearance of [U-C-13]palmitic- and [U-C-13]linoleic acid in plasma and liver, compared to controls, either when administered as a bolus or continuously (all at least -63%, P < 0.05). Liver [U-C-13]palmitic acid appearance was higher than [U-C-13]linoleic acid appearance, either when administered as a bolus (2.8-fold, P < 0.01) or continuously (5.7-fold, P < 0.01). Conclusions: The intestinal capacity to absorb long-chain fatty acids is severely reduced in rats with methotrexate-induced mucositis. Continuous administration does not overcome this impairment. The liver takes up and/or retains mainly saturated fatty acids during mucositis. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据