4.6 Article

Age dependent electroencephalographic changes in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)

期刊

CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
卷 125, 期 8, 页码 1626-1638

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2013.12.118

关键词

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; Electroencephalography; Eyes-closed resting-state; Support vector machine; Linear regression; Development

资金

  1. University Research Priority Program Integrative Human Physiology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Objective biomarkers for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) could improve diagnostics or treatment monitoring of this psychiatric disorder. The resting electroencephalogram (EEG) provides non-invasive spectral markers of brain function and development. Their accuracy as ADHD markers is increasingly questioned but may improve with pattern classification. Methods: This study provides an integrated analysis of ADHD and developmental effects in children and adults using regression analysis and support vector machine classification of spectral resting (eyes-closed) EEG biomarkers in order to clarify their diagnostic value. Results: ADHD effects on EEG strongly depend on age and frequency. We observed typical non-linear developmental decreases in delta and theta power for both ADHD and control groups. However, for ADHD adults we found a slowing in alpha frequency combined with a higher power in alpha-1 (8-10 Hz) and beta (13-30 Hz). Support vector machine classification of ADHD adults versus controls yielded a notable cross validated sensitivity of 67% and specificity of 83% using power and central frequency from all frequency bands. ADHD children were not classified convincingly with these markers. Conclusions: Resting state electrophysiology is altered in ADHD, and these electrophysiological impairments persist into adulthood. Significance: Spectral biomarkers may have both diagnostic and prognostic value. (C) 2014 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据