4.6 Article

Safety of EEG-fMRI recordings in newborn infants at 3T: A study using a baby-size phantom

期刊

CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
卷 125, 期 5, 页码 941-946

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2013.09.041

关键词

fMRI-EEG co-registration; High-density EEG; Newborn; Resting state networks; Neonatal neurophysiology; Neonatal EEG

资金

  1. Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital Foundation
  2. European Community [254235]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: We aimed to study EEG electrode temperatures during MRI recordings using a neonatal-size phantom to establish the safety of neonatal EEG-MRI. Methods: We constructed a phantom set-up for co-registration of EEG and MRI measurements with newborn size configurations. The set-up consisted of a spherical glass phantom fitted with a customised MRI-compatible 64-channel EEG cap and EEG amplifier. Temperatures were recorded during and after five different scanning sequences (two T2/sensitised BOLD fMRI, one T1-weighted and two T2-weighted spin echo) in five electrode locations using a thermistor that was integrated into the electrode housing. A temperature increase >4 degrees C was defined a priori as the safety limit. Results: During fMRI and T1 sequences, none of the electrodes showed meaningful temperature changes. Only one MRI sequence (T2 with Max turbo factor 25; SAR 89%) caused temperature increase in one electrode (Fpz; +4.1 degrees C) that slightly exceeded our predefined safety limit, while the conventional T2 sequence was within safety limits (up to +1.7 degrees C). Conclusions: Co-registration of EEG and fMRI can be considered safe in babies with respect to electrode heating, which is the primary safety concern. Significance: The present findings open up a possibility to commence studies where EEG and MRI/fMRI are co-registered in human babies. Such studies hold significant promise of a better understanding of the early development of brain function and neurovascular coupling. (C) 2013 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据