4.6 Article

Quantitative EEG analysis in neonatal hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy

期刊

CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
卷 122, 期 8, 页码 1671-1678

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2010.12.059

关键词

Neonatal EEG; Hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy; Quantitative EEG analysis; Classification of HIE grades

资金

  1. Health Research Board, Ireland [CRT/2008/31]
  2. Science Foundation Ireland [08/RFP/CMS1733]
  3. Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) [08/RFP/CMS1733] Funding Source: Science Foundation Ireland (SFI)
  4. Health Research Board (HRB) [CRT-2008-31] Funding Source: Health Research Board (HRB)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To test the hypothesis that quantitative EEG (qEEG) measures are associated with a grading of HIE based on the visual interpretation of neonatal EEG (EEG/HIE). Methods: Continuous multichannel video-EEG data were recorded for up to 72 h. One-hour EEG segments from each recording were visually analysed and graded by two electroencephalographers (EEGers) blinded to clinical data. Several qEEG measures were calculated for each EEG segment. Kruskal-Wallis testing with post hoc analysis and multiple linear regression were used to assess the hypothesis. Results: Fifty-four full-term infants with HIE were studied. The relative delta power, skewness, kurtosis, amplitude, and discontinuity were significantly different across four EEG/HIE grades (p < 0.05). A linear combination of these qEEG measures could predict the EEG/HIE grade assigned by the EEGers with an accuracy of 89%. Conclusion: Quantitative analysis of background EEG activity has shown that measures based on the amplitude, frequency content and continuity of the EEG are associated with a visual interpretation of the EEG performed by experienced EEGers. Significance: Identifying qEEG measures that can separate between EEG/HIE grades is an important first step towards creating a classifier for automated detection of EEG/HIE grades. (C) 2011 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据