4.1 Article

Impact of statins on nephrolithiasis in hyperlipidemic patients: a 10-year review of an equal access health care system

期刊

CLINICAL NEPHROLOGY
卷 79, 期 5, 页码 351-355

出版社

DUSTRI-VERLAG DR KARL FEISTLE
DOI: 10.5414/CN107775

关键词

urinary stone; urolithiasis; nephrolithiasis; hyperlipidemia; statin; vascular disease

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim. To investigate the impact of statin medications on urinary stone formation in hyperlipidemic patients. Material and methods: We searched outpatient military electronic health records from the Southwestern United States to identify adult patients with hyperlipidemia and urolithiasis. Military facilities serve active duty members, retirees, and their immediate family members. We created two predictor variables - with and without statin. The outcome variable was a diagnosis of urolithiasis. Results: The inception cohort included 57,232 subjects with hyperlipidemia and 1,904 subjects with nephrolithiasis. Patients taking statin medications had significantly less stone formation compared to patients not taking statin medications (3.1% vs. 3.7%, univariate OR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.76 - 0.91, p < 0.001). Statins patients were significantly older (59 vs. 45 years, p < 0.001), more likely to be female (38% vs. 34%, p < 0.001) and have co-morbidities (obesity, hypertension, diabetes, heart disease; all p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis indicated that statin medications had a protective effect against stone formation (OR = 0.51, 95% CI 0.46 - 0.57, p < 0.001), after adjusting for age, sex, and comorbidities. The risk of nephrolithiasis was not only additive for diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and obesity; more importantly it was attenuated with addition of statin use. Conclusion: Statin medications are associated with reduced risk of urinary stones. This is the first study to demonstrate the impact of statins on nephrolithiasis. Further prospective studies are necessary to validate these findings that treatment of hyperlipidemia reduces stone risk formation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据