4.6 Article

Flow-Mediated Vasodilation in End-Stage Renal Disease

期刊

出版社

AMER SOC NEPHROLOGY
DOI: 10.2215/CJN.01260211

关键词

-

资金

  1. GEPIR (Groupe d'Etude de la Physiopathologie de l'Insuffisance Renale)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and objectives An intact endothelium is essential for adaptations between arterial vasomotor tone and shear stress (SS), i.e., flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD). Endothelial dysfunction occurs in hypertension, cardiac insufficiency, diabetes, atherosclerosis, and in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients, whose renal failure is associated with many of those cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Design, setting, participants, & measurements Using a progressive hand-warming protocol and repeated measures ANOVA, we analyzed SS-mediated increase of brachial artery diameter (Delta BA) in 22 healthy controls, 18 CVD-negative ESRD patients (ESRD-CVD-), and 17 CVD-positive ESRD patients (ESRD-CVD+) to analyze the role of uremia versus CVD on FMD. Results Hand-warming increased SS (P < 0.001) and Delta BA (P < 0.001). Negative interactions were observed between Delta BA and ESRD (P < 0.001), and between Delta BA and CVD+ (P < 0.02), but there was no interaction between ESRD and CVD+ (P = 0.69). For low and mild SS increases, ESRD-CVD- patients were characterized by similar Delta BA as controls, but it was lower than controls at higher SS (P < 0.01). In ESRD-CVD+ patients, brachial artery diameter did not respond to mild and moderate SS increases, and showed paradoxical vasoconstriction at higher SS (P < 0.05). In ESRD, a positive and independent interaction was observed between Delta BA and 25(OH) vitamin D-3 insufficiency (15 mu g/L; P < 0.02). Conclusions These observations indicate that, independently of each other, ESRD and CVD+ history are associated with endothelial dysfunction. They also suggest the importance of considering the relationships between SS and endothelial function in different clinical conditions. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 6: 2009-2015, 2011. doi: 10.2215/CJN.01260211

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据