4.4 Article

Pain assessment as intervention - A study of older adults with severe dementia

期刊

CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN
卷 24, 期 8, 页码 697-707

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e318172625a

关键词

dementia; pain; older adults; elderly; PACSLAC; assessment

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
  2. CIHR Investigator Award
  3. CIHR Health Research Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: The communication impairments that characterize severe dementia make pain assessment challenging. As such, pain problems often go undetected. Our goal was to determine whether systematic pain assessment leads to improved pain management practices and decreases nursing stress in comparison with a control condition. Methods: We adopted a 3-month comparative longitudinal design. Nursing staff regularly assessed dementia patients' pain through the use of the Pain Assessment Checklist for Seniors with Limited Ability to Communicate (PACSLAC). A second group of nurses completed an attention-control measure for a control group of patients. In addition, nursing staff regularly completed measures of work stress to investigate the effects of the workload associated with systematic pain assessment on nurse stress. Results: Regular use of the PACSLAC improved pain management practices over time as reflected in increased usage of analgesic medications (prescribed on as needed basis) in comparison with the control group. As pain interventions increased, a corresponding decrease in observable pain behaviors (as reflected on the PACSLAC assessments that were completed by the nurses) was observed. In addition, nurses who used the PACSLAC reported decreased distress and burnout over time. Discussion: This investigation provides strong support for both the importance of systematic pain assessment in long-term care and for the clinical utility of the PACSLAC in improving pain management practices and decreasing caregiver distress.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据