4.5 Article

Further genotype - phenotype correlations in neurofibromatosis 2

期刊

CLINICAL GENETICS
卷 77, 期 2, 页码 163-170

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2009.01315.x

关键词

frameshift mutations; genotype; phenotype; large deletions; neurofibromatosis 2; nonsense mutations

资金

  1. NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Central Manchester Foundation Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Neurofibromatosis 2 (NF2) is caused by mutations in the NF2 gene predisposing carriers to develop nervous system tumours. Different NF2 mutations result in either loss/reduced protein function or gain of protein function (abnormally behaving mutant allele i.e. truncated protein potentially causing dominant negative effect). We present a comparison between the clinical presentations of patients with mutations that are predicted to produce truncated protein (nonsense/frameshift mutations) to those that results in loss of protein expression (large deletions) to elucidate further genotype-phenotype correlations in NF2. Patients with nonsense/frameshift mutations have a younger age of diagnosis and a higher prevalence/proportion of meningiomas (p = 0.002, p = 0.014), spinal tumours (p = 0.004, p = 0.004) and non-VIII cranial nerve tumours (p = 0.006, p = 0.003). We also found younger age of diagnosis of vestibular schwannomas (p = 0.007), higher mean numbers of cutaneous lesions (p = 0.003) and spinal tumours (p = 0.006) in these patients. With respect to NF2 symptoms, we found younger age of onset of hearing loss (p = 0.010), tinnitus (p = 0.002), paraesthesiae (p = 0.073), wasting and weakness (p = 0.001) and headaches (p = 0.049) in patients with nonsense/frameshift mutations. Our comparison shows, additional, new correlations between mutations in the NF2 gene and the NF2 disease phenotype, and this further confirms that nonsense/frameshift mutations are associated with more severe NF2 symptoms. Therefore patients with this class of NF2 mutation should be followed up closely.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据