4.4 Article

Vestibular disorders in euthyroid patients with Hashimoto's thyroiditis: role of thyroid autoimmunity

期刊

CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 81, 期 4, 页码 600-605

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cen.12471

关键词

-

资金

  1. Fondazione Umberto Di Mario

向作者/读者索取更多资源

IntroductionA relationship between vestibular disorders and thyroid autoimmunity independently from thyroid function has been postulated. AimTo shed more light on the actual relationship between vestibular lesions and Hashimoto's thyroiditis (HT) regardless of thyroid function. MethodsForty-seven patients with HT (894% F; aged 483127years), 21 with multinodular goitre (MNG; 571% F; 54198years) and 30 healthy volunteers (567% F; 507 +/- 139years) were enrolled. Inclusion criteria were the presence of normal thyroid function tests and no clinical history of vestibular dysfunction. Each subject was submitted to complete vestibular evaluation [Caloric Test, Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs), Head Shaking Test (HST)]. Results522% of HT patients showed an alteration of VEMPs and 447% of caloric test (P<00001 for both). None of the MNG patients showed any vestibular alteration, while one healthy control showed an altered caloric test. A correlation was found between vestibular alterations of HT patients and the degree of serum TPOAb level, not affected by age and serum TSH value. By logistic regression analysis, the absence of thyroid autoimmunity significantly reduced the risk of vestibular alterations: HR 0.19 (95%CI: 0003-0.25, P=00004) for caloric test; HR 007 (95%CI: 002-0425, P<00001) for VEMPs; and HR 022 (95%CI: 006-07, P=001) for HST. ConclusionIn euthyroid HT patients, a significant relationship between subclinical vestibular damage and the degree of TPOAb titre was documented. This finding suggests that circulating antithyroid autoantibodies may represent a risk factor for developing vestibular dysfunction. An accurate vestibular evaluation of HT patients with or without symptoms is therefore warranted.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据