4.5 Article

Dynamic simulation of hazard analysis of radiations from LNG pool fire

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2015.04.010

关键词

Dynamic simulation; Hazard analysis; LNG; Pool fire radiation; Mitigation

资金

  1. Key Laboratory of LNG Cryogenic Technology of Guangdong High Education Institute [39000-3211101]
  2. SYSU-BP LNG Centre [99103-9390001]
  3. Key Laboratory of Fire Science and Technology of Guangdong Province [2010A060801010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Because of its highly flammable nature, any accidental release of liquefied natural gas (LNG) could possibly pose significant fire hazard. In this study, a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model was used to analyze this hazard around an existing LNG station. By assuming an LNG pool fire occurring in an impoundment area, dynamic simulations of flame development have been carried out. In order to provide more reliable simulation results, a study was first conducted to determine the mesh independence and suitable time step. The results of CFD simulations were also compared with those using the commonly-used phenomenological model. The simulation results showed that LNG tanks in the neighbor dike area could withstand the received radiant heat flux, and the areas involving human activities, such as security office and public area, were also secure enough for people to escape from the hazards. LNG vaporizers, which are often located close to tank area, could possibly receive relatively higher radiant heat flux. High temperature achieved on vaporizers could cause material failure. CFD calculations have also indicated that increasing the spacing distance or using flowing water curtain could reduce this temperature. It is concluded that CFD method is significantly more effective to account for LNG hazard analysis and provide realistic results for complicated scenarios, thus providing meaningful information for safety consideration. (c) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据