4.7 Review

Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 (PCSK9): Lessons Learned from Patients with Hypercholesterolemia

期刊

CLINICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 60, 期 11, 页码 1380-1389

出版社

AMER ASSOC CLINICAL CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2014.225946

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Identification of the proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) as the third gene causing familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) and understanding its complex biology has led to the discovery of a novel class of therapeutic agents. CONTENT: PCSK9 undergoes autocatalytic cleavage in the endoplasmic reticulum and enters the secretory pathway. The PCSK9 gene is under the regulatory control of sterol receptor binding proteins 1 and 2. Statins increase PCSK9 and this may modulate the response to this class of medications. In plasma, PCSK9 binds to the epidermal growth factor-like domain of the LDL receptor (LDL-R) on the cell and, once incorporated in the late endosomal pathway, directs the LDL-R toward lysosomal degradation rather than recycling to the plasma membrane. Thus, gain-of-function PCSK9 mutations lead to an FH phenotype, whereas loss-of-function mutations are associated with increased LDL-R-mediated endocytosis of LDL particles and lower LDL cholesterol in plasma. Inhibition of PCSK9 is thus an attractive therapeutic target. Presently, this is achieved by using monoclonal antibodies for allosteric inhibition of the PCSK9-LDL-R interaction. Phase 2 and 3 clinical trials in patients with moderate and severe hypercholesterolemia (including FH) show that this approach is safe and highly efficacious to lower LDL-C and lipoprotein(a). SUMMARY: PCSK9 has other biological roles observed in vitro and in animal studies, including viral entry into the cell, insulin resistance, and hepatic tissue repair. Given the potential number of humans exposed to this novel class of medications, careful evaluation of clinical trial results is warranted. (C) 2014 American Association for Clinical Chemistry

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据