4.7 Article

Motor Chip: A Comparative Genomic Hybridization Microarray for Copy-Number Mutations in 245 Neuromuscular Disorders

期刊

CLINICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 57, 期 11, 页码 1584-1596

出版社

AMER ASSOC CLINICAL CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2011.168898

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministero della Salute [RF-MUL-2007-666195]
  2. TREAT-NMD
  3. [FP7/2007-2013]
  4. [223143]
  5. Fondazione Telethon Funding Source: Custom

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) is a reference high-throughput technology for detecting large pathogenic or polymorphic copy-number variations in the human genome; however, a number of quantitative monogenic mutations, such as smaller heterozygous deletions or duplications, are usually missed in most disease genes when proper multiplex ligation-dependent probe assays are not performed. METHODS: We developed the Motor Chip, a customized CGH array with exonic coverage of 245 genes involved in neuromuscular disorders (NMDs), as well as 180 candidate disease genes. We analyzed DNA samples from 26 patients with known deletions or duplications in NMDs, 11 patients with partial molecular diagnoses, and 19 patients with a clinical diagnosis alone. RESULTS: The Motor Chip efficiently confirmed and refined the copy-number mutations in all of the characterized patients, even when only a single exon was involved. In noncharacterized or partially characterized patients, we found deletions in the SETX (senataxin), SGCG [sarcoglycan, gamma (35kDa dystrophin-associated glycoprotein)], and LAMA2 (laminin, alpha 2) genes, as well as duplications involving LAMA2 and the DYSF [dysferlin, limb girdle muscular dystrophy 2B (autosomal recessive)] locus. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of exon-specific gene coverage and optimized platform and probe selection makes the Motor Chip a complementary tool for molecular diagnosis and gene investigation in neuromuscular diseases. (C) 2011 American Association for Clinical Chemistry

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据