4.7 Review

Microarray-Based Genomic DNA Profiling Technologies in Clinical Molecular Diagnostics

期刊

CLINICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 55, 期 4, 页码 659-669

出版社

AMER ASSOC CLINICAL CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2008.112821

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Microarray-based genomic DNA profiling (MGDP) technologies are rapidly moving from translational research to clinical diagnostics and have revolutionized medical practices. Such technologies have shown great advantages in detecting genomic imbalances associated with genomic disorders and single-gene diseases. CONTENT: We discuss the development and applications of the major array platforms that are being used in both academic and commercial laboratories. Although no standardized platform is expected to emerge soon, comprehensive oligonucleotide microarray platforms-both comparative genomic hybridization arrays and genotyping hybrid arrays-are rapidly becoming the methods of choice for their demonstrated analytical validity in detecting genomic imbalances, for their flexibility in incorporating customized designs and updates, and for the advantage of being easily manufactured. Copy number variants (CNVs), the form of genomic deletions/duplications detected through MGDP, are a common etiology for a variety of clinical phenotypes. The widespread distribution of CNVs poses great challenges in interpretation. A broad survey of CNVs in the healthy population, combined with the data accumulated from the patient population in clinical laboratories, will provide a better understanding of the nature of CNVs and enhance the power of identifying genetic risk factors for medical conditions. SUMMARY: MGDP technologies for molecular diagnostics are still at an early stage but are rapidly evolving. We are in the process of extensive clinical validation and utility evaluation of different array designs and technical platforms. CNVs of currently unknown importance will be a rich source of novel discoveries. (C) 2009 American Association for Clinical Chemistry

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据