4.7 Article

Nondisruptive p53 Mutations Are Associated with Shorter Survival in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

期刊

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
卷 20, 期 17, 页码 4647-4659

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-2391

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Redes Tematicas de Investigacion en Cancer, Spanish Ministry of Health [RD12/0036/0072]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: TP53 mutations in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) may be associated with worse survival but their prognostic role in advanced NSCLC is controversial. In addition, it remains unclear whether mutated patients represent a clinically homogeneous group. Experimental Design: Weretrospectively examined TP53 mutations and outcome in a training cohort of 318 patients with stage IIIB-IV NSCLC: 125 epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) wild-type (wt) and 193 EGFR mutated (mut). An independent validation cohort of 64 EGFR-mut patients was subsequently analyzed. Mutations were classified as disruptive and nondisruptive according to their predicted degree of disturbance of the p53 protein structure and function. Results: In the training cohort, TP53 mutations were found in 43 of the 125 EGFR-wt patients (34.4%). Of these, 28 had nondisruptive TP53 mutations and a median overall survival (OS) of 8.5 months, compared with 15.6 months for the remaining 97 patients (P = 0.003). In the EGFR-mut group, TP53 mutations were found in 50 of the 193 patients (25.9%). The OS for the 26 patients with TP53 nondisruptive mutations was 17.8 months versus 28.4 months for the remaining 167 patients (P = 0.04). In the validation cohort, the 11 patients with nondisruptive TP53 mutations had a median OS of 18.1 months compared with 37.8 months for the 53 remaining patients (P = 0.006). In multivariate analyses, nondisruptive TP53 mutations had an independent, significant association with a shorter OS. Conclusions: Nondisruptive mutations in the TP53 gene are an independent prognostic factor of shorter survival in advanced NSCLC. (C) 2014 AACR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据