4.7 Article

Decreased Blood Flow with Increased Metabolic Activity: A Novel Sign of Pancreatic Tumor Aggressiveness

期刊

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
卷 15, 期 17, 页码 5511-5517

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-0414

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. EU FP6 Commission [505785]
  2. Turku University Hospital [13018]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To study blood flow (BF) and metabolism in normal pancreas and in different pancreatic lesions. We then determined the effect of these biomarkers on outcome in patients with pancreatic cancer. Experimental Design: Oxygen-15-labeled water and fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography scans were used in 26 patients with a suspicion of pancreatic cancer to measure pancreatic BF and metabolism. In addition, the ratio of standardized uptake value to BF (SUV/BF) was calculated. Patients were divided into three groups: patients with a finding of normal pancreas (n = 7), benign lesions (n = 8), and malignant tumors In = 11). Results: Patients with benign and malignant pancreatic tumors had decreased BF of the lesion by 48% and 60%, respectively, compared with patients with normal pancreatic tissue. SUVmax was 3-fold higher in malignant tumors compared with both benign lesions and normal pancreas (P < 0.05). In contrast, the SUVmax. of patients with benign lesions and normal pancreas did not differ. The SUV/BF ratio was significantly higher in malignant lesions than in benign lesions or in patients with normal pancreas (P < 0.05). In patients with cancer, high SUV/BF ratio was a stronger predictor of poor survival compared with high metabolism or lower-than-normal pancreatic BF. Conclusions: BF in pancreatic cancer is significantly reduced compared with the normal pancreas, which may in part explain the poor success of both radiotherapy and chemotherapy. We suggest that the composite measurement of BF and metabolism in pancreatic cancer could serve as a novel tool in the planning of treatments targeting vasculature. (Clin Cancer Res 2009;15(17):5511-7)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据