4.7 Article

Design of Folate-Linked Liposomal Doxorubicin to its Antitumor Effect in Mice

期刊

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
卷 14, 期 24, 页码 8161-8168

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0159

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan
  2. Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, Japan
  3. Open Research Center

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Tumor cell targeting is a promising strategy for enhancing the therapeutic potential of chemotherapy agents. Polyethylene glycol (PEG)-coated (sterically stabilized) liposomes show enhanced accumulation on the surface of tumors, but steric hindrance by PEGylation reduces the association of the liposome-bound ligand with its receptor. To increase folate receptor (FR) targeting, we optimized the concentration and PEG spacer length of folate-PEG-lipid in liposomes. Experimental Design: Three types of folate-linked liposomal doxorubicin were designed and prepared by optimizing the concentration and PEG spacer length of folate-PEG-lipid in PEGylated or non-PEGylated liposomes and by masking folate-linked liposomes where the folate ligand is masked by adjacent PEG spacers. The liposome targeting efficacy was evaluated in vitro and in vivo. Results: In human oral carcinoma KB cells, which overexpress FR, modification with sufficiently long PEG spacer and a high concentration of folate ligand to non-PEGylated liposomes increased the FR-mediated association and cytotoxicity more than with PEGylated and masked folate-linked liposomes. On the contrary, in mice bearing murine lung carcinoma M109, modification with the folate ligand in PEGylated and masked folate-linked liposomes showed significantly higher antitumor effect than with non-PEGylated liposomes irrespective of the length of time in the circulation after intravenous injection. Conclusions: The results of this study will be beneficial for the design and preparation of ligand-targeting carriers for cancer treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据