4.5 Review

Effectiveness of practices to reduce blood culture contamination: A Laboratory Medicine Best Practices systematic review and meta-analysis

期刊

CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 45, 期 13-14, 页码 999-1011

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2012.06.007

关键词

Bacterial infections/diagnosis; Blood culture; Blood specimen collection/methods/standards; Comparative effectiveness research; Contamination; False positive reactions; Healthcare quality improvement; Laboratory medicine; Phlebotomy; Practice guideline

资金

  1. Laboratory Medicine Best Practices Initiative [W911NF-07-D0001/DO 0191/TCN 07235]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: This article is a systematic review of the effectiveness of three practices for reducing blood culture contamination rates: venipuncture, phlebotomy teams, and prepackaged preparation/collection (prep) kits. Design and methods: The CDC-funded Laboratory Medicine Best Practices Initiative systematic review methods for quality improvement practices were used. Results: Studies included as evidence were: 9 venipuncture (vs. versus intravenous catheter), 5 phlebotomy team; and 7 prep kit. All studies for venipuncture and phlebotomy teams favored these practices, with meta-analysis mean odds ratios for venipuncture of 2.69 and phlebotomy teams of 2.58. For prep kits 6 studies effect sizes were not statistically significantly different from no effect (meta-analysis mean odds ratio 1.12). Conclusions: Venipuncture and the use of phlebotomy teams are effective practices for reducing blood culture contamination rates in diverse hospital settings and are recommended as evidence-based best practices with high overall strength of evidence and substantial effect size ratings. No recommendation is made for or against prep kits based on uncertain improvement. (C) 2012 The Canadian Society of Clinical Chemists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据