4.2 Article

Hereditary nephrogenic diabetes insipidus in Japanese patients: analysis of 78 families and report of 22 new mutations in AVPR2 and AQP2

期刊

CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL NEPHROLOGY
卷 17, 期 3, 页码 338-344

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10157-012-0726-z

关键词

Aquaporin 2; Urine concentration; Vasopressin; Vasopressin receptor; Kidney collecting duct

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Familial form of nephrogenic diabetes insipidus (NDI) is a rare hereditary disease caused by arginine vasopressin type 2 receptor (AVPR2) or water channel aquaporin 2 (AQP2) gene mutations. It is speculated that 90 % of NDI families carry disease-causing mutations in AVPR2 and 10 % carry the mutations in AQP2; however, these percentages have not been supported by actual data. It is also unknown whether these percentages vary in different ethnic groups. Gene mutation analyses were performed for 78 Japanese NDI families. All exons and intron-exon boundaries of the AVPR2 and AQP2 genes were directly sequenced. A total of 62 families (79 %) carried disease-causing mutations in AVPR2, while nine families (12 %) carried mutations in AQP2. We identified 22 novel putatively disease-causing mutations (19 in AVPR2 and 3 in AQP2). Regarding AVPR2, 52 disease-causing mutations were identified. Among them, missense mutations were most common (54 %), followed by deletion mutations. In the 64 women who had monoallelic disease-causing AVPR2 mutations, 16 (25 %) had NDI symptoms, including 4 complete NDI subjects. Regarding AQP2, 9 disease-causing mutations were identified in nine families. Two missense mutations and one deletion mutation showed a recessive inheritance, while one missense mutation and five small deletion mutations in the C-terminus of AQP2 showed a dominant inheritance. Most Japanese NDI families carry disease-causing mutations in AVPR2 and 12 % carry mutations in AQP2. A total of 22 novel putatively disease-causing mutations were identified. The relatively high occurrence of symptomatic carriers of AVPR2 mutations needs attention.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据