4.5 Article

Effect of high advanced-collagen tripeptide on wound healing and skin recovery after fractional photothermolysis treatment

期刊

CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL DERMATOLOGY
卷 39, 期 8, 页码 874-880

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ced.12405

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundCollagens have long been used in pharmaceuticals and food supplements for the improvement of skin. AimWe evaluated the efficacy of high advanced-collagen tripeptide (HACP) on wound healing and skin recovery. MethodsUsing an in vitro model, we performed HaCaT cell migration assays and collagen gel contraction assays using HACP concentrations of 1, 10 and 100g/mL. In this pilot study, eight healthy volunteers were randomly divided into two groups. Both the control and experimental groups received fractional photothermolysis treatment, but in the experimental group, four subjects received 3g/day of oral collagen peptide (CP) for 4weeks. To assess transepidermal water loss in each patient before and after the treatment, we used a Corneometer and a Cutometer, and we also assessed the patient's Erythema Index. ResultsThe cell migration assay showed that HACP enhanced wound closure, but not in a dose-dependent manner. The collagen gel contraction assay showed increased contractility when patients were treated with 100g/mL HACP, but the results were not significantly different from those of controls. We found that post-laser erythema resolved faster in the experimental group than in the control group (P<0.05). In addition, the recovery of skin hydration after fractional laser treatment was greater in the experimental group than in the control group by day 3 (P<0.05), and the experimental group showed significantly improved post-treatment skin elasticity compared with the controls by day 14 (P<0.05). ConclusionsCollagen tripeptide treatment appears to be an effective and conservative therapy for cutaneous wound healing and skin recovery after fractional photothermolysis treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据