4.3 Article

Arylsulfatase B regulates colonic epithelial cell migration by effects on MMP9 expression and RhoA activation

期刊

CLINICAL & EXPERIMENTAL METASTASIS
卷 26, 期 6, 页码 535-545

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10585-009-9253-z

关键词

ASB; Chondroitin-4-sulfate; Colonic epithelial cells; Extracellular matrix; MMP9; Migration; RhoA

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Arylsulfatase B (ASB; N-acetylgalactosamine-4-sulfatase; 4-sulfatase; ARSB) is the enzyme that removes 4-sulfate groups from N-acetylgalactosamine 4-sulfate, which combines with glucuronate to form the disaccharide unit of chondroitin-4-sulfate (C4S). In this study, we report how variation in expression of ASB affected the migration of human colonic epithelial cells. In the T84 cell line, derived from lung metastasis of malignant colonic epithelial cells, the activity of ASB, as well as steroid sulfatase, arylsulfatase A, and galactose-6-sulfatase, were significantly less than in normal, primary colonic epithelial cells and in the NCM460 cell line which was derived from normal colonocytes. In the T84 cells, matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9), activated RhoA, and cell migration, as well as C4S content, were significantly more than in the NCM460 cells. Silencing and overexpression of ASB had inverse effects on MMP9, activated RhoA, and cell migration, as well as the C4S content, in the NCM460 and T84 cells. When ASB expression was silenced by siRNA in the NCM460 cells, MMP9 secretion increased to over 3 times the basal level, activated RhoA increased similar to 85%, and cell migration increased similar to 52%. Following overexpression of ASB, MMP9 declined 51%, activated RhoA declined similar to 51%, and cell migration decreased similar to 37%. These findings demonstrate marked effects of ASB expression on the migratory activity of colonic epithelial cells, activated RhoA, and MMP9, and suggest a potential vital role of ASB, due to its impact on chondroitin sulfation, on determination of the invasive phenotype of colonic epithelial cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据