4.7 Article

Mean postprandial triglyceride concentration is an independent risk factor for carotid atherosclerosis in patients with type 2 diabetes

期刊

CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 430, 期 -, 页码 134-139

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2013.12.022

关键词

Postprandial hypertriglyceridemia; Diabetic dyslipidemia; Carotid atherosclerosis

资金

  1. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23590689] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Postprandial hypertriglyceridemia is a risk factor for atherosclerotic disease. However, the postprandial triglyceride (PTG) concentration fluctuates markedly and is poorly reproducible. The aim of this study was to determine whether the mean PTG (mean-PTG) concentration is a risk factor for carotid atherosclerosis in patients with type 2 diabetes. Methods: We measured the fasting and postprandial lipid concentrations, and the maximum intima-media thickness (max IMT) of carotid arteries by ultrasound in 115 diabetic patients. A carotid plaque was defined as max IMT of >1.0 mm. The mean-PTG concentration was calculated from several PTG concentrations measured on different days during a 1-year follow-up period. Results: PTG concentrations showed marked intra-individual variability, and ranged from 0.29 to 6.03 mmol/l. Patients with carotid plaques had higher mean-PTG concentrations than those without carotid plaques (1.51 +/- 0.57 vs. 1.29 +/- 0.47 mmol/l,p = 0.025). Neither fasting triglycerides nor one-point PTG concentrations differed between the two groups. Multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis revealed that the mean-PTG concentration was significantly associated with carotid plaques [OR 1.20 (95% CI, 1.05-137), p = 0.009], even after adjusting for traditional risk factors including HDL-cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, age, hypertension, and duration of diabetes. Conclusions: The mean-PTG concentration is an independent risk factor for carotid atherosclerosis in patients with type 2 diabetes. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据