4.7 Article

A single nucleotide polymorphism in LRP2 is associated with susceptibility to Alzheimer's disease in the Chinese population

期刊

CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 412, 期 3-4, 页码 268-270

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2010.10.015

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; LRP2; Apolipoprotein E; Single nucleotide polymorphism

资金

  1. National Basic Research Development Program of China [2006CB500706, 2010CB945200]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30700251]
  3. Shanghai Key Discipline Program [S30202]
  4. Shanghai Key Project of Basic Science Research [09DZ1950400]
  5. Program for Outstanding Medical Academic Leader [LJ 06003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: LRP2 (also called megalin) plays a potential key role in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Recently, one genome-wide association study has revealed that the rs3755166 (G/A) polymorphism located in the LRP2 promoter is associated with development of AD in Caucasians, while there are no studies on the association LRP2 of with AD risk in Asians. Methods: To evaluate the relationship between the rs3755166 polymorphism of the LRP2 gene and AD in the ethnic Chinese Han, we conducted a case-control study (n = 361, age > 50) to determine the prevalence of one common single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) of LRP2 (rs3755166) in patients with AD in Chinese population of Mainland China, and clarified whether this polymorphism is a risk factor for AD. Results: The prevalence of the minor allele (A) in the rs3755166 polymorphism was significantly different in AD patients and control subjects (P < 0.05). The rs3755166 polymorphism was associated with AD in the ethnic Chinese Han (OR = 1.378, 95% Cl: 1.017-1.867, P = 0.039), and the results were not influenced by age, gender, or APOE status (P = 0.441, P = 0.94, P = 0.432, respectively). Conclusion: Our data revealed the allele (A) of the rs3755166 polymorphism within LRP2 gene may contribute to AD risk in the Chinese Han Population. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据