4.7 Article

The value of apelin-36 and brain natriuretic peptide measurements in patients with first ST-elevation myocardial infarction

期刊

CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 411, 期 23-24, 页码 2014-2018

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2010.08.024

关键词

Apelin-36; BNP; STEMI

资金

  1. Medical University in Bialystok, Poland [3-537101L]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: We aimed to assess apelin novel endogenous ligand for the angiotensin-like 1 receptor in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and to compare its value with B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP). Methods: In 78 consecutive patients with first STEMI treated with primary PCI. plasma apelin-36 (RIA) and BNP (MEIA) concentrations were measured twice: on admission and on the fifth day of hospitalization. Left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) was assessed on admission and composite endpoint (CEP)-after 1 year follow-up. Results: During the 5-day interval median plasma BNP level significantly increased and median plasma apelin concentration significantly decreased. BNP, but not apelin, correlated with low LVEF (<50%). In ROC analysis only BNP measurements were diagnostic for low LVEF. In ANOVA test, in patients with CEP, a significant decrease in apelin (but not BNP) concentrations measured in 5-day interval was found. ROC analysis identified only second BNP measurement as significant to estimate adverse outcome 0.627 in the prediction of CEP (95% confidence interval =0.507-0.736). Conclusion: Following STEMI there is a decrease of plasma apelin-36 concentration and an increase of plasma BNP concentration. BNP is better, than apelin diagnostic value for the detection of impaired LVEF. Both BNP and apelin have prognostic value, although both needs further evaluation. (C) 2010 Elsevier By. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据