4.5 Article

Development of COS genes as universally amplifiable markers for phylogenetic reconstructions of closely related plant species

期刊

CLADISTICS
卷 24, 期 5, 页码 727-745

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2008.00207.x

关键词

-

资金

  1. Autonomous Province of Trento [GP664- 210303, GP3299-301204]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With the aim of developing widely applicable gene markers for phylogenetic reconstructions at low taxonomic level, we tested the low copy nuclear Conserved Ortholog Set (COS) genes. Most of the 15 genes tested provided good amplification efficiency (as compared with rbcL) from a set of 67 representative angiosperm families. Nine selected COS markers were further characterized at both intra- and interfamilial level on a test set, including 25 species representative of 15 different families. While four of the COS led to incongruent results, the remaining five improved the phylogenetic reconstructions of closely related species as illustrated in the case of Orobanchaceae species. They were found to be highly informative in phylogenetic reconstruction of congeneric species, where introns provide a higher proportion of parsimony informative sites in comparison with traditional phylogenetic markers such as ITS and matK. At higher phylogenetic distance, where only coding regions could be aligned, the polymorphism levels of the COS ranged between those of ndhF and matK. On the basis of these results, the success rate in developing universally amplifiable low copy nuclear markers based on COS genes is about 30%. We report the successful development of five pCOS that, together with a few other well characterized genes, such as Rpb2 and GbssI, can be considered the closest approximation to low-copy universally amplifiable markers for phylogeny in plants at present. The possible pitfalls of universally amplifiable COS marker development and their range of applicability at different taxonomic levels in comparison with traditional phylogenetic molecular markers are discussed. (C) The Willi Hennig Society 2008.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据