4.3 Article

Prognostic Implications of Pulmonary Hypertension in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Study From the FRANCE 2 Registry

期刊

CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS
卷 7, 期 2, 页码 240-247

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.113.000482

关键词

aortic valve stenosis; hypertension, pulmonary

资金

  1. Edwards Lifesciences
  2. Medtronic

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background-Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is associated with poor prognosis in patients with severe aortic stenosis. The aim of this multicenter study was to describe clinical outcome after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Methods and Results-The FRANCE 2 Registry included all patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation in France in 2010 and 2011. Patients were divided into 3 groups depending on systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP) estimated in transthoracic echocardiography: group I, sPAP <40 mm Hg (no PH); group II, sPAP 40 to 59 mm Hg (mild-to-moderate PH); and group III, sPAP >= 60 mm Hg (severe PH). Patients were followed up for 1 year. A total of 2435 patients whose pre-transcatheter aortic valve implantation sPAP was reported were included. A total of 845 were in group I (34.7%), 1112 in group II (45.7%), and 478 in group III (19.6%). Procedural success, early complications, and 30-day mortality were statistically similar across sPAP groups. One-year mortality was higher in groups II and III (group I, 22%; group II, 28%; and group III, 28%; P=0.032). Mild-to-moderate and severe PH were identified as an independent factor of all-cause mortality. The major adverse cardiovascular event rates did not differ according to sPAP. New York Health Association functional class improved significantly in all groups. Conclusions-PH (sPAP >= 40 mm Hg) in patients with aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation was associated with increased 1-year mortality especially when severe (sPAP >= 60 mm Hg) but not with increased

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据