4.7 Article

Heat Shock Protein 70 Enhances Vascular Bone Morphogenetic Protein-4 Signaling by Binding Matrix Gla Protein

期刊

CIRCULATION RESEARCH
卷 105, 期 6, 页码 575-U171

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.109.202333

关键词

heat shock protein 70; matrix Gla protein; bone morphogenetic protein; protein interaction

资金

  1. NIH [HL30568, HL81397]
  2. American Heart Association (Western Affiliate)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rationale: Matrix Gla protein (MGP) is a calcification inhibitor, which binds and inhibits bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)-2 and -4. Objective: The objective was to determine whether MGP also binds other proteins, which could interfere with its function. Methods and Results: We transfected bovine aortic endothelial cells with N-terminally FLAG-tagged MGP and used immunoprecipitation and liquid chromatographic-tandem mass spectrometric analysis to identify MGP-binding proteins. Heat shock protein (HSP) 70, a stress-induced protein expressed in atherosclerotic lesions and soluble in serum, was identified as a novel MGP-binding protein. The interaction between MGP and HSP70 was confirmed by coimmunoprecipitation and chemical crosslinking, and blocked the interaction between MGP and BMP-4. In endothelial cells, HSP70 enhanced BMP-4-induced proliferation and tube formation, and in calcifying vascular cells, HSP70 enhanced BMP-induced calcium deposition. In addition, HSP70 mediated the procalcific effect of interleukin-6 on calcifying vascular cells. In apolipoprotein E-null mice, a model for atherosclerosis, levels of BMP-4, HSP70, MGP, and interleukin-6 were elevated in the aortic wall. Levels of BMP-4, HSP70, and interleukin-6 were also elevated in serum, and anti-HSP70 antibodies diminished its procalcific effect on calcifying vascular cells. Conclusion: HSP70 binds MGP and enhances BMP activity, thereby functioning as a potential link between cellular stress, inflammation, and BMP signaling. ( Circ Res. 2009; 105: 575-584.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据