4.5 Article

Characteristics of Revascularization Treatment for Arteriosclerosis Obliterans in Patients With and Without Hemodialysis

期刊

CIRCULATION JOURNAL
卷 74, 期 11, 页码 2426-2433

出版社

JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOC
DOI: 10.1253/circj.CJ-09-0910

关键词

Angioplasty; Bypass surgery; Hemodialysis outcomes; Peripheral arterial disease

资金

  1. Okinaka Memorial Institute for Medical Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Limb ischemia is a major complication in patients who are receiving hemodialysis (HD). In this study, distinctive features and factors affecting the outcome of HD patients with limb ischemia are identified. Methods and Results: One hundred and eighty consecutive symptomatic limb ischemic patients who were or were not receiving HD and who successfully underwent surgical bypass grafting (bypass, n=75) or endovascular angioplasty (percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), n=105) were retrospectively compared at our hospital. The endpoint of this study was amputation of the ischemic leg or death. Median follow up was 2.25 years. The amputation-free survival of HD patients was significantly lower than that of non-HD patients (P<0.0001). In the bypass group, the amputation-free survival of HD patients was significantly lower than that of non-HD patients (P=0.0002), even if the graft was patented or not (P=0.77). In contrast, in the PTA group, the amputation-free survival of HD patients was lower than that of non-HD patients (P=0.03), and with a significantly lower patency rate (P=0.0004). Predictors of amputation-free survival differed between HD and non-HD patients; predictors were diabetes mellitus and gender in HD patients, while they were Fontaine classification and hyperlipidemia in non-HD patients. The infectious death rate was higher in HD patients than in non-HD patients (53% vs 22%, P<0.05). Conclusions: This study clearly showed a poorer prognosis in HD patients than in non-HD patients especially after bypass surgery, even if the the graft was patented or not. (Circ J 2010; 74: 2426-2433)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据