4.8 Article

Cost-Effectiveness of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Compared With Standard Care Among Inoperable Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis Results From the Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves (PARTNER) Trial (Cohort B)

期刊

CIRCULATION
卷 125, 期 9, 页码 1102-1109

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.054072

关键词

aortic stenosis; transcatheter valve therapy; cost-effectiveness; clinical trials

资金

  1. Edwards Lifesciences, Inc.
  2. Edwards Lifesciences
  3. Biosense Webster
  4. Sanofi-aventis
  5. St. Jude Medical
  6. Medtronic
  7. Eli Lilly
  8. Daiichi Sankyo
  9. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  10. Abbott Vascular
  11. MedRad
  12. Merck/Schering-Plough
  13. Eli Lilly-Daiichi Sankyo
  14. Schering-Plough
  15. Cordis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background-In patients with severe aortic stenosis who cannot have surgery, transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has been shown to improve survival and quality of life compared with standard therapy, but the costs and cost-effectiveness of this strategy are not yet known. Methods and Results-The PARTNER trial randomized patients with symptomatic, severe aortic stenosis who were not candidates for surgery to TAVR (n = 179) or standard therapy (n = 179). Empirical data regarding survival, quality of life, medical resource use, and hospital costs were collected during the trial and used to project life expectancy, quality-adjusted life expectancy, and lifetime medical care costs to estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness of TAVR from a US perspective. For patients treated with TAVR, mean costs for the initial procedure and hospitalization were $42 806 and $78 542, respectively. Follow-up costs through 12 months were lower with TAVR ($29 289 versus $53 621) because of reduced hospitalization rates, but cumulative 1-year costs remained higher ($106 076 versus $53 621). We projected that over a patient's lifetime, TAVR would increase discounted life expectancy by 1.6 years (1.3 quality-adjusted life-years) at an incremental cost of $79 837. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for TAVR was thus estimated at $50 200 per year of life gained or $61 889 per quality-adjusted life-year gained. These results were stable across a broad range of uncertainty and sensitivity analyses. Conclusions-For patients with severe aortic stenosis who are not candidates for surgery, TAVR increases life expectancy at an incremental cost per life-year gained well within accepted values for commonly used cardiovascular technologies. Clinical Trial Registration-URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00530894. (Circulation. 2012;125:1102-1109.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据