4.8 Article

Right Ventricular Structure Is Associated With the Risk of Heart Failure and Cardiovascular Death The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA)-Right Ventricle Study

期刊

CIRCULATION
卷 126, 期 14, 页码 1681-+

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.095216

关键词

heart ventricles; hypertension, pulmonary; magnetic resonance imaging; pulmonary heart disease; survival

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01-HL086719, R01-HL077612, K24-HL103844, N01-HC95159, N01-HC95160, N01-HC95161, N01-HC95162, N01-HC95163, N01-HC95164, N01-HC95165, N01-HC95166, N01-HC95167, N01-HC95168, N01-HC95169]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background-Changes in right ventricular (RV) morphology are associated with morbidity and mortality in heart and lung disease. We examined the association of abnormal RV structure and function with the risk of heart failure or cardiovascular death in a population-based multiethnic sample free of clinical cardiovascular disease at baseline. Methods and Results-The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) performed cardiac magnetic resonance imaging on 5098 participants between 2000 and 2002 with follow-up for incident heart failure and cardiovascular death (death) until January 2008. RV volumes and mass were available for 4204 participants. The study sample (n=4144) was 61.4 +/- 10.1 years old and 47.6% male. The presence of RV hypertrophy (increased RV mass) was associated with more than twice the risk of heart failure or death after adjustment for demographics, body mass index, education, C-reactive protein level, hypertension, and smoking status (hazard ratio, 2.52; 95% confidence interval, 1.55-4.10; P<0.001) and a doubling (or more) of risk with left ventricular mass at the mean value or lower (P for interaction=0.05). Conclusions-RV hypertrophy was associated with the risk of heart failure or death in a multiethnic population free of clinical cardiovascular disease at baseline. (Circulation. 2012;126:1681-1688.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据