4.3 Article

Circadian Variability of Cystatin C, Creatinine, and Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) in Healthy Men during Normal Sleep and after an Acute Shift of Sleep

期刊

CHRONOBIOLOGY INTERNATIONAL
卷 25, 期 6, 页码 1047-1061

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/07420520802553614

关键词

Circadian rhythm; Creatinine; Cystatin C; Glomerular filtration rate; MDRD

资金

  1. Uppsala University Hospital Research Fund
  2. Swedish Tercentary Fund
  3. Swedish Society for Medical Research and Rut
  4. Arvid Wolff's Memory Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The estimation of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is essential for the evaluation of patients with kidney disease and for the treatment of patients with medications that are eliminated by the kidneys. Plasma cystatin C has been shown in several studies to be superior to plasma creatinine for the estimation of GFR. However, there is limited information on the circadian variation of cystatin C and estimated GFR using cystatin C (eGFRCystC) or The Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study (MDRD) (eGFRMDRD) equations. We studied the circadian variation of cystatin C and creatinine during night- and day-sleep conditions in seven healthy volunteers. Serum samples were collected every hour (48 samples per individual) to evaluate the effect of different sampling times on the test results. The median intra-individual coefficients of variations for the studied markers were 4.2% for creatinine, 4.7% for eGFRMDRD, 5.5% for cystatin C, and 7.7% for eGFRCystC. Neither cystatin C nor creatinine differed significantly between the night- and day-sleep conditions. Cystatin C differed significantly with time of day (p=.0003), but this was not the case for creatinine (p=.11). The circadian variation of cystatin C was minor. Small but significant increases in creatinine values and a decrease of eGFRMDRD were observed after food intake. Thus, cystatin C and creatinine sampling does not have to be restricted to specific times of the day.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据