4.2 Article

Multiple independent evolutionary losses of XY pairing at meiosis in the grey voles

期刊

CHROMOSOME RESEARCH
卷 20, 期 2, 页码 259-268

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10577-011-9261-0

关键词

meiosis; recombination; synapsis; synaptonemal complex; pseudoautosomal region; MLH1; SCP3; vole; Arvicolinae

资金

  1. Russian Foundation for Basic Research
  2. Siberian Department of Russian Academy of Sciences
  3. Far Eastern Department of Russian Academy of Sciences
  4. National Science Foundation
  5. Japan Science Society

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In many eutherian mammals, X-Y chromosome pairing and recombination is required for meiotic progression and correct sex chromosome disjunction. Arvicoline rodents present a notable exception to this meiotic rule, with multiple species possessing asynaptic sex chromosomes. Most asynaptic vole species belong to the genus Microtus sensu lato. However, many of the species both inside and outside the genus Microtus display normal X-Y synapsis at meiosis. These observations suggest that the synaptic condition was present in the common ancestor of all voles, but gaps in current taxonomic sampling across the arvicoline phylogeny prevent identification of the lineage(s) along which the asynaptic state arose. In this study, we use electron and immunofluorescent microscopy to assess heterogametic sex chromosome pairing in 12 additional arvicoline species. Our sample includes ten species of the tribe Microtini and two species of the tribe Lagurini. This increased breadth of sampling allowed us to identify asynaptic species in each major Microtine lineage. Evidently, the ability of the sex chromosomes to pair and recombine in male meiosis has been independently lost at least three times during the evolution of Microtine rodents. These results suggest a lack of evolutionary constraint on X-Y synapsis in Microtini, hinting at the presence of alternative molecular mechanisms for sex chromosome segregation in this large mammalian tribe.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据