4.2 Article

Detecting the breakup of spiral waves in small-world networks of neurons due to channel block

期刊

CHINESE SCIENCE BULLETIN
卷 57, 期 17, 页码 2094-2101

出版社

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s11434-012-5114-2

关键词

spiral wave; factor of synchronization; Hodgkin-Huxley neurons; small-world networks; channel block

资金

  1. Educational Tutors Fund Projects of Gansu Province [1010ZTC088]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11072099]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Lanzhou University of Technology [Q200706]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The breakup of a spiral wave by blockade of sodium and potassium channels in a small-world network of Hodgkin-Huxley neurons is investigated in detail. The influence of ion channel block in poisoned excitable membrane patches of a certain size is measured, by varying channel noise and channel densities resulting from the change in conductance. For example, tetraethylammonium is known to cause a block (poisoning) of potassium channels, while tetrodotoxin blocks sodium channels. We observed the occurrence of spiral waves, which are ordered waves believed to play an important role in facilitating the propagation of electric signals across quiescent regions of the brain. In this paper, the effect of channel block was measured by the factors x (K) and x (Na), which represent the ratios of unblocked, or active, ion channels, to the overall number of potassium or sodium ion channels, respectively. To quantify these observations, we use a simple but robust synchronization measure, which succinctly captures the transition from spiral waves to other collective states, such as broken segments resulting from the breakup of the spiral wave. The critical thresholds of channel block can be inferred from the abrupt changes occurring in plots of the synchronization measure against different values of x (K) and x (Na). Notably, small synchronization factors can be tightly associated with states where the formation of spiral waves is robust to mild channel block.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据