4.2 Article

Stable isotopes of modern herbivore tooth enamel in the Tibetan Plateau: Implications for paleoelevation reconstructions

期刊

CHINESE SCIENCE BULLETIN
卷 55, 期 1, 页码 45-54

出版社

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s11434-009-0543-2

关键词

herbivore; tooth enamel; stable isotopes (delta C-13 and delta O-18); paleoelevation; Tibetan Plateau

资金

  1. Chinese Academy of Sciences [KZCX2-YW-Q09-03]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation [40625008]
  3. National Basic Research Program of China [2009CB421000]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fossil tooth enamel from herbivores is considered one of the best proxies for paleoclimate and paleoelevation reconstructions, due to its low susceptibility to diagenetic alteration. A synthesis of oxygen and carbon isotope analyses of modern tooth enamel from herbivores such as Tibetan yaks, asses and antelopes is assessed. The average delta C-13(PDB) value of herbivore tooth enamel in the Lhasa and south Qiangtang terrains is -11.3% +/- 1.1%, whereas in the north Qiangtang and Hoh Xil terrains value is -10.2% +/- 1.4% consistent with the current C3-dominant ecotype in the Tibetan Plateau. In addition, the average delta O-18(PDB) values from tooth enamel show a northward systematic increase from -11.8% +/- 3.4% in the Gyirong Basin, to -11.1% +/- 1.1% in the Lhasa and southern Qiangtang terrains, and then to -9.0% +/- 1.1% in the northern Qiangtang and the Hoh Xil areas, similar to those of the local river water and precipitation variation trends. It is suggested that delta O-18(PDB) values of tooth enamel should not be used directly to evaluate the paleo-elevation of the Tibetan Plateau, because oxygen isotopic composition from tooth enamel is a combination of drinking water (precipitation- and river-sourced) and diet (plant-sourced). Moreover, an empirical relationship between oxygen isotope of tooth enamel and modern river water, and as well as elevation is recommended, which can be used in future studies of Tibetan Plateau paleoelevation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据