4.6 Article

Properdin Provides Protection from Citrobacter rodentium-Induced Intestinal Inflammation in a C5a/IL-6-Dependent Manner

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 194, 期 7, 页码 3414-3421

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1401814

关键词

-

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  2. Nova Scotia Health Research Foundation
  3. Crohn's and Colitis Foundation of Canada
  4. IWK graduate studentship award
  5. MRC [G0700859, G0801952, G0501425, G1000191] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Citrobacter rodentium is an attaching and effacing mouse pathogen that models enteropathogenic and enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli in humans. The complement system is an important innate defense mechanism; however, only scant information is available about the role of complement proteins during enteric infections. In this study, we examined the impact of the lack of properdin, a positive regulator of complement, in C. rodentium-induced colitis. Following infection, properdin knockout (P-KO) mice had increased diarrhea and exacerbated inflammation combined with defective epithelial cell-derived IL-6 and greater numbers of colonizing bacteria. The defect in the mucosal response was reversed by administering exogenous properdin to P-KO mice. Then, using in vitro and in vivo approaches, we show that the mechanism behind the exacerbated inflammation of P-KO mice is due to a failure to increase local C5a levels. We show that C5a directly stimulates IL-6 production from colonic epithelial cells and that inhibiting C5a in infected wild-type mice resulted in defective epithelial IL-6 production and exacerbated inflammation. These outcomes position properdin early in the response to an infectious challenge in the colon, leading to complement activation and C5a, which in turn provides protection through IL-6 expression by the epithelium. Our results unveil a previously unappreciated mechanism of intestinal homeostasis involving complement, C5a, and IL-6 during bacteria-triggered epithelial injury.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据